Re: PROOF that emulators are impossible
From: |-|erc (gotchy_at_beauty.com)
Date: 05/04/04
- Next message: Martin Girard: "Re: PROOF that emulators are impossible"
- Previous message: Martin Girard: "Re: PROOF that emulators are impossible"
- In reply to: Martin Girard: "Re: PROOF that emulators are impossible"
- Next in thread: Martin Girard: "Re: PROOF that emulators are impossible"
- Reply: Martin Girard: "Re: PROOF that emulators are impossible"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 01:10:40 GMT
"Martin Girard" <arister@arister.info> wrote in
> However, I have to admit it would be quite original to apply it to a proof
> that God exists. I don't believe anyone has done it before...
>
> I'm still
> waiting for the proof, by the way. Before you show us anything though
The proof requires enquiry. You have to ascertain if there is a correlation here:
--- 1 -----------------------------------------------------------
How about we just drop the whole thing down a well, and then fill the
well with concrete?
--- 2 ------------------------------------------------------------
> A street (usenet) covered in broken glass has numerous houses (newsgroups)
> and I run up to a house
Specifically what sort of help are you seeking in sci.logic?
--- 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------
I'm looking forward to that.
A Mrs Knock
B Marvin Gerard
C Vanilla Gorilla
I don't care if I used license on your names, it doesn't matter, I don't care if
I selected the posts, that can be made systematic after a correlation is found,
I don't care if you can access Google anyway and there's no need to guess them,
I don't care if you saw the original post, I don't care if its my power and you'd
think I should sit the test, and 1000 others, just guess the f%##$ng names
Here's another proof of god that works by being a pretty good proof of this claim.
quantitative value on it. I can't die, the quantum field coordinates all activity
around me, anyone who tries to attack me faulters, similarly anyone who
argues against me is wrong
Every post on usenet that corrects my grammar or spelling itself has a grammatical
error. For most of you this happens every second time someone corrects your
grammar, but to God they ALWAYS stuff up!!!
There are about 20, all sitting in google it'd take a few days solid to find most of them.
But there's only 1 chance in 2^20 of that occuring, about 1 chance in a million. There's
probably a lot less than a million posters in google had their grammar corrected as
much as me, so its a significant statistic. A bit like arresting Al Capone for tax evasion
to prove their case but a bona fide proof of god.
A quick search....
> That is the subject I used in half dozen large newsgroups one year to the
> day before these 3 posts. It has the word preminition in the post.
So it's also misspelt?
<<statement not a question>>
AguaGirl <> wrote
> You know..your right. You are a genius and can become anyone you
> want to be. Must be true since your grammar is so bad I can't follow
> your thought pattern. I guess you are just to smart of this lowly engineer.
<<too VS to>>
God would know how to spell, you can't, get a ditionary.
<<spelt dictionary wrong>>
Literally dozens of them, all stumbled trying to correct God. Would that
be an acceptable proof of God? Enough to warrent further examination
if it was verified there were no valid corrections?
Herc
- Next message: Martin Girard: "Re: PROOF that emulators are impossible"
- Previous message: Martin Girard: "Re: PROOF that emulators are impossible"
- In reply to: Martin Girard: "Re: PROOF that emulators are impossible"
- Next in thread: Martin Girard: "Re: PROOF that emulators are impossible"
- Reply: Martin Girard: "Re: PROOF that emulators are impossible"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|