Re: neurons and artificial intelligence 2

From: bob (okamsracer_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 05/27/04 

Date: 27 May 2004 10:18:40 -0700

David Longley <David@longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<tUZAaxFRPdsAFwu@longley.demon.co.uk>...

> In article <02f5f2846b799addb280619b2932921@news.teranews.com>, Glen M.
> Sizemore <gmsizemore2@yahoo.com> writes

> >GS:Nice try Rickert. Even mentalists will recognize Thorndike's and Skinner's
> >law of effect (even if idiots like Minsky do not). But tell me something,
> >Mr. Originality, what IS the role of the setting in which an animal
> >"stimulates the environment" and gets it to "give it food?"
> >
> >
> >
> >You really are pitiful.
> >
> >
> >
>
> DL: To state the obvious (to others), Rickert's behaviour (and Minsky's
> perhaps) are clear examples of how people (*authoritatively* in the
> latter's case) propagate and reinforce myths.

now the 2 parrots of behaviorpism are calling the father of AI an
idiot. you guys are too true for words.

Quantcast