P vs. NP Problem; 1WayFx Model a possible solution.
From: Marius Ionescu (marius_ionescu_at_1wayfx.com)
Date: 05/30/04
- Next message: JXStern: "Re: Hardware/Software Dichotomy and Platonism (Re: expectations being satisfied)"
- Previous message: Barb Knox: "Re: limitation to the halting proof"
- Next in thread: Lance Lamboy: "Re: P vs. NP Problem; 1WayFx Model a possible solution."
- Reply: Lance Lamboy: "Re: P vs. NP Problem; 1WayFx Model a possible solution."
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: P vs. NP Problem; 1WayFx Model a possible solution."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 May 2004 10:36:59 -0700
Hello,
1WayFx Model demonstrates the existence of a class of problems in
NP–P, and therefore P is strictly included in NP.
Consequently, the associated cryptosystem is an unbreakable security
solution, which solves today's major implementation issues, including
difficulty of deployment, data/message integrity, security exposure,
and performance.
Please visit my Web site for the model fundamentals, presentation and
demo at 1wayfx.com.
I would welcome an opportunity to discuss this solution with you.
Thank you for your consideration.
Best Regards,
Marius Ionescu
- Next message: JXStern: "Re: Hardware/Software Dichotomy and Platonism (Re: expectations being satisfied)"
- Previous message: Barb Knox: "Re: limitation to the halting proof"
- Next in thread: Lance Lamboy: "Re: P vs. NP Problem; 1WayFx Model a possible solution."
- Reply: Lance Lamboy: "Re: P vs. NP Problem; 1WayFx Model a possible solution."
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: P vs. NP Problem; 1WayFx Model a possible solution."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|