neurons and artificial intelligence 2

From: bob (okamsracer_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 05/30/04 

Date: 30 May 2004 14:14:25 -0700

>> > David Longley <David@longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>> > news:<tUZAaxFRPdsAFwu@longley.demon.co.uk>...
>> >
>> >> In article <02f5f2846b799addb280619b2932921@news.teranews.com>,
Glen M.
>> >> Sizemore <gmsizemore2@yahoo.com> writes
>> >> >GS:Nice try Rickert. Even mentalists will recognize Thorndike's
and
>> >> >Skinner's law of effect (even if idiots like Minsky do not).
But tell
>> >> >me something, Mr. Originality, what IS the role of the setting
in which
>> >> >an animal "stimulates the environment" and gets it to "give it
food?"
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >You really are pitiful.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> DL: To state the obvious (to others), Rickert's behaviour (and
Minsky's
>> >> perhaps) are clear examples of how people (*authoritatively* in
the
>> >> latter's case) propagate and reinforce myths.
>> >

>>easier to forgive exuberance than rude parrots who preach only
neagativity.
>
>It wasn't "exuberance" that I was correcting, it was the propagation
and
>reinforcement (intentionally or not) of specific falsehoods.
>
>To an ignorant, undiscriminating "reader" like you, that appears, no
>doubt, to be no more than a slur.
>
>Careful criticism is fundamental to the practice of science. It's
>anathema to pseudo-scientific mythologies like "Cognitivism".
>
>--
>David Longley

you 2 parrots are inverted inside. you cannot separate 'careful
criticism' from namecalling. to a behaviorist there is no difference.
why not we wonders? send yer attack parrot Dr Sizemore to make more
dirty words. were waiting, Perfesser Longley.

Quantcast