Re: VOTE on whether 1/oo = 0
From: |-|erc (gotch_at_beauty.com)
Date: 07/15/04
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Previous message: Paul Chapman: "Re: {JPEG}Discrete Cosine Transformation"
- In reply to: David W. Cantrell: "Re: VOTE on whether 1/oo = 0"
- Next in thread: David W. Cantrell: "Re: VOTE on whether 1/oo = 0"
- Reply: David W. Cantrell: "Re: VOTE on whether 1/oo = 0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:46:15 GMT
"David W. Cantrell" <DWCantrell@sigmaxi.org> wrote in
> > I do have a liberal perspective on the topic also.
> >
> > IF you define division by infinity to start with
> > THEN you could assign that result as 0.
>
> I advise against doing that.
> It's better to define the elements of the extension and the appropriate
> operations _in general_ first. Done correctly, 1/oo = 0 would then follow
notice my disclaimer before I state that the result could be 0.
If you were given a test
1/oo =
a/ 1
b/ 0
c/ oo
d/ 10
The answer is 0. Why? because the questioner put the question into a form
that clarifies "division" by 0 is allowable syntax.
Given the denominator can accept oo as a construct, the answer is 0.
I assume this is the logic behind Rheimann sphere, its just locating the electron
due north in the electron cloud isn't it?
Herc
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Previous message: Paul Chapman: "Re: {JPEG}Discrete Cosine Transformation"
- In reply to: David W. Cantrell: "Re: VOTE on whether 1/oo = 0"
- Next in thread: David W. Cantrell: "Re: VOTE on whether 1/oo = 0"
- Reply: David W. Cantrell: "Re: VOTE on whether 1/oo = 0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|