Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?
From: Peter Olcott (olcott_at_att.net)
Date: 07/15/04
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: VOTE on whether 1/oo = 0"
- In reply to: Chairman of the Ozzy Osbourne Appreciation Society: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:48:07 GMT
> Given the source code for TM1, it's no problem at all
> to construct or write a second program which bases its
> behavior on TM1 simply by embedding the source code
> or text of the first program into that of the second.
> Thus, the absence of IPC during execution of TM1 is
> immaterial. The behavior of the counter-example program
> isn't based on run-time IPC but based on the static
> encoding, or source code of TM1.
Even the statically encoded source code proves that I
am correct.
All this could produce is (like the original) another way that
the Halting Problem can not be solved. You really need to
take a look at my Possible Bases for Refutation section. I
have already fully addressed this line-of-reasoning here.
You can make a way that doesn't work. Making a way
that does not work does not prohibit my way from
always working.
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "Re: VOTE on whether 1/oo = 0"
- In reply to: Chairman of the Ozzy Osbourne Appreciation Society: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]