Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?

From: Kent Paul Dolan (xanthian_at_well.com)
Date: 07/16/04 

Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:59:37 +0000 (UTC)

"Peter Olcott" <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote:

> That is all well and good, but, then how do you
> explain that no one had been able to correctly
> refute this proof?

... in the mind of Peter Olcott.

That's the "invincible" part of your "invincible
ignorance": _lots_ of people have refuted you.

You just refuse to acknowledge the refutations, or
are too dim to understand them, take your choice.

How sad for you, as it leaves you trapped wasting
your life defending drivel.

By the way, you've now upgraded your kook-factor
with the famous Arthur T. Murray technique: flogging
your URL in response to every challenge, or in fact
in response to anything at all, including a request
for the time of day between two strangers, neither
talking to you at all. Well done!

I _still_ think you have more to learn at the feet
of uber-kook James Harris, though, before you can be
acknowledged formally as a denizen of the highest
ranks of Usenet kook-dom. Don't waste a moment more,
subscribe to sci.math _now_!

HTH

xanthian. 

-- 
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Can you find anything wrong with this solution to the Halting Problem?
    ... "Peter Olcott" wrote: ... > refute this proof? ... in the mind of Peter Olcott. ... your URL in response to every challenge, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?
    ... Peter Olcott wrote: ... > No I just changed my mind with respect to that one posting. ... You can't refute it ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?
    ... Peter Olcott wrote: ... > No I just changed my mind with respect to that one posting. ... You can't refute it ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Watch how fast this happens
    ... appeared in talk.origins, posted by el cid ... Tough to refute a non-assertion, ... an insult even though there wasn't any idiocy to refute. ... I was referring to the collective response. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Can extra processing threads help in this case?
    ... The secret is that Peter Olcott is really an AI program that is being entered to win the Loebner Prize. ... Each time a post was made by the Peter Olcott program, it would incorporate the suggestions from previous posts by members of this group. ... The bottom line is that while we may not know the true identity of the programmers behind the Peter Olcott hoax, it is possible that the internet anagram program may have come up with an appropriate response to his spamming of a Windows newsgroup with questions that are to be implemented on Linux... ... Can we all get back to real MFC programs and real MFC programmers now??? ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)