Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion
From: Daryl McCullough (daryl_at_atc-nycorp.com)
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: Hans Hüttel: "Re: accepting vs. recognizing"
- Previous message: d. lee: "Is unsorted DB searching in NP?"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Next in thread: Mitch Harris: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Reply: Mitch Harris: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Reply: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 20 Jul 2004 05:38:50 -0700
Peter Olcott says...
>They why is it that no one has found a single valid refutation?
Peter, the reason you *believe* that no one has found a refutation
is because you are not competent to recognize a valid argument when
you see one. You have been given many valid refutations, and you
were no more able to understand them than my cat.
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
- Next message: Hans Hüttel: "Re: accepting vs. recognizing"
- Previous message: d. lee: "Is unsorted DB searching in NP?"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Next in thread: Mitch Harris: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Reply: Mitch Harris: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Reply: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
