Re: accepting vs. recognizing
From: Hans Hüttel (hans_at_cs.auc.dk)
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: Mitch Harris: "Re: Is unsorted DB searching in NP?"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- In reply to: Moritz: "accepting vs. recognizing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:48:13 +0200
Moritz wrote:
> can anybody please explain if there is a distinction for a Turing-Machine to
> accept or to recognize a recursive language?
> I guess there is none. Hopcroft, Motwani and Ullman talk about
> Turing-Machines accepting words and recognizing languages..
This terminology is sometimes a source of confusion.
A Turing machine accepts a string w if it terminates in an accepting
state, when given w as input.
The language recognized by a Turing machine M is the set
L(M) = { w | M accepts w }
In other words, machines accept strings and recognize languages.
Hans
- Next message: Mitch Harris: "Re: Is unsorted DB searching in NP?"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- In reply to: Moritz: "accepting vs. recognizing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|