Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion

From: Mitch Harris (harrisq_at_tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de)
Date: 07/20/04


Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:06:07 +0200

Daryl McCullough wrote:
> Peter Olcott says...
>
>>They why is it that no one has found a single valid refutation?
>
> Peter, the reason you *believe* that no one has found a refutation
> is because you are not competent to recognize a valid argument when
> you see one. You have been given many valid refutations, and you
> were no more able to understand them than my cat.

Cats can only count up to four.

-- 
Mitch Harris
(remove q to reply)


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Disproof of the Halting Problems Conclusion
    ... >>They why is it that no one has found a single valid refutation? ... > is because you are not competent to recognize a valid argument when ... > were no more able to understand them than my cat. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Disproof of the Halting Problems Conclusion
    ... > Peter Olcott says... ... >>They why is it that no one has found a single valid refutation? ... > is because you are not competent to recognize a valid argument when ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: Disproof of the Halting Problems Conclusion
    ... > Peter Olcott says... ... >>They why is it that no one has found a single valid refutation? ... > is because you are not competent to recognize a valid argument when ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website
    ... What else could explain the complete lack of a single valid refutation? ... > time believing it (which is probably why few scientists are religious, ... Then why is it that you have not been able to express this great clarity? ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website
    ... What else could explain the complete lack of a single valid refutation? ... > time believing it (which is probably why few scientists are religious, ... Then why is it that you have not been able to express this great clarity? ...
    (sci.logic)