Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion

From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer (ajo_at_nospam.andrew.cmu.edu)
Date: 07/20/04 

Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:48:05 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Daryl McCullough wrote:
>
> Peter Olcott says...
> >They why is it that no one has found a single valid refutation?
>
> Peter, the reason you *believe* that no one has found a refutation
> is because you are not competent to recognize a valid argument when
> you see one. You have been given many valid refutations, and you
> were no more able to understand them than my cat.

  Is your cat hard to understand? :)

-Arthur

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Disproof of the Halting Problems Conclusion
    ... > Peter Olcott says... ... >>They why is it that no one has found a single valid refutation? ... Is your cat hard to understand? ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Disproof of the Halting Problems Conclusion
    ... > Peter Olcott says... ... >>They why is it that no one has found a single valid refutation? ... > is because you are not competent to recognize a valid argument when ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: Disproof of the Halting Problems Conclusion
    ... > Peter Olcott says... ... >>They why is it that no one has found a single valid refutation? ... > is because you are not competent to recognize a valid argument when ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website
    ... What else could explain the complete lack of a single valid refutation? ... > time believing it (which is probably why few scientists are religious, ... Then why is it that you have not been able to express this great clarity? ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website
    ... What else could explain the complete lack of a single valid refutation? ... > time believing it (which is probably why few scientists are religious, ... Then why is it that you have not been able to express this great clarity? ...
    (sci.logic)