Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion
From: Peter Olcott (olcott_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 07/21/04
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- In reply to: Will Twentyman: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Reply: Will Twentyman: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Reply: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:56:20 GMT
> > They why is it that no one has found a single valid refutation?
>
> Why is it that you have ignored my refutation?
>
> --
> Will Twentyman
> email: wtwentyman at copper dot net
>
It was not valid, whether you understand why or not.
I will try very hard to make what I am saying clear
enough so that everyone here will understand it. I
am not the best writer, and that is part of the problem.
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- In reply to: Will Twentyman: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Next in thread: Will Twentyman: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Reply: Will Twentyman: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Reply: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: Disproof of the Halting Problem's Conclusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|