Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem
From: Andrew Koenig (ark_at_acm.org)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Andrew Koenig: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:01:23 GMT
"Peter Olcott" <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:OWqOc.154819$OB3.83130@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> The only reason that not everyone has agreed with everything
> that I have said is that they don't bother to examine what I am
> saying at the same level detail that makes what I say become true.
> I a very subtle level of detail nearly everything that I have said
> is fully true.
Just remember: "nearly" is merely a polite way of saying "not."
- Next message: Andrew Koenig: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
