Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website
From: Rick Decker (rdecker_at_hamilton.edu)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Craig Feinstein: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Previous message: Rick Decker: "Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website"
- In reply to: David C. Ullrich: "Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website"
- Next in thread: Mitch Harris: "Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website"
- Reply: Mitch Harris: "Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:27:22 -0400
David C. Ullrich wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:51:17 +0000 (UTC), ">parr\(*>"
> <KurlyGina@tenretnitb.moc> wrote:
>
>
>>[...]
>>
>>I have agreed to help you without abuse, so I will not say these
>>things.
>>
>
> unrelated question: is there a name for this rhetorical "i'm
> not going to say that..." device? argumentum ad what?
>
That rhetorical pattern is called apophesis or praeteritio,
depending on whether you prefer Greek or Latin. A common
example is "I wouldn't call him a liar, but he does have to
have someone else call his hogs."
Regards,
Rick
- Next message: Craig Feinstein: "Re: paper claiming p=np and soap bubbles"
- Previous message: Rick Decker: "Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website"
- In reply to: David C. Ullrich: "Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website"
- Next in thread: Mitch Harris: "Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website"
- Reply: Mitch Harris: "Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|