Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem
From: Chris Menzel (cmenzel_at_remove-this.tamu.edu)
Date: 08/01/04
- Next message: Chris Menzel: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Next in thread: Howard: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 1 Aug 2004 03:54:49 GMT
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 03:03:09 GMT, Peter Olcott <olcott@worldnet.att.net> said:
> see right here is another example! i only said not to report the
> result to the function being analyzed, and you leap to the stupid
> conclusion without ever paying any attention to what i am saying! i
> have posted exactly what i mean by this for several weeks. the address
> is not hard to remember its www.halting-problem.com how the hell do
> you expect to refute me if you don't even know what i am saying ???
No one has to read your silly bumbling at the URL noted to refute you.
You have claimed both that the proof of the halting problem is flawed
and also that you've solved the halting problem. Since the proof of the
haling problem is obviously sound (if you disagree, identify the flaw:
http://tinyurl.com/6ow6c), you are refuted, a priori. Your claims are
OBVIOUSLY false, and any reasoning in support of them OBVIOUSLY
confused.
Chris Menzel
- Next message: Chris Menzel: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Next in thread: Howard: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|