Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem
From: Eray Ozkural exa (erayo_at_bilkent.edu.tr)
Date: 08/02/04
- Next message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: Karl Heinz Buchegger: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Mitch Harris: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Next in thread: Mitch Harris: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Reply: Mitch Harris: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Reply: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 2 Aug 2004 03:13:00 -0700
harrisq@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de (Mitch Harris) wrote in message news:<2n4u0hFt28phU1@uni-berlin.de>...
> Peter Olcott <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> >"Eray Ozkural exa" <erayo@bilkent.edu.tr> wrote in message
> >>
> >> What is the probability that all of the computer scientists who
> >> responded to you have a poorer understanding of the problem than
> >> yourself? (Hint: assume that there are 10 people who responded to you
> >> independently)
> >
> >I will answer that question with another question.
> >What is the probability that the ad verecundiam fallacy is not an
> >error of reasoning?
> >http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AdVerecundiam
>
> in mathematics, very high. So that would make the answer to Eray's
> question...?
I think I'll just make a calculation that is highly optimistic for
Peter.
If we assume that the probability one computer scientist has poorer
understanding of the halting problem than Peter is 0.7, then for 10
people, it becomes about 0.282, around 3%, for 10 independent
responses. :) Not a very high probability, but I think in reality it
is much less than that...
Cheers,
-- Eray Ozkural
- Next message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Previous message: Karl Heinz Buchegger: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Mitch Harris: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Next in thread: Mitch Harris: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Reply: Mitch Harris: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Reply: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|