Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?
From: Michael N. Christoff (mchristoff_at_sympatico.caREMOVETHIS)
Date: 08/04/04
- Next message: Paul E. Black: "Re: Density of a random DAG ?"
- Previous message: Simon G Best: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- In reply to: Mitch Harris: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: Mitch Harris: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- Reply: Mitch Harris: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:01:50 -0400
"Mitch Harris" <harrisq@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote in message
news:2ncdavFs8okeU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Michael N. Christoff <mchristoff@sympatico.caREMOVETHIS> wrote:
> >"Martin Shobe" <mshobe@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> >
> >> From what I understand, Rice's theorem rules this out. Essentially,
> >> the set of TM's that "contain" a Halt program isn't Turing computable.
> >>
> >
> >I'm not so sure about that. Rice said determining whether an arbitrary
TM
> >has a particular property is impossible if: the property holds for some
but
> >not all TMs, and the property depends on the TM's output (language)
alone -
> >not its construction*.
>
> Right. so it -is- possible to do things like count the number of states
> (er.. decide if the number of states is a certain number).
>
> >The property P = "does not contain a Halt program"
> >is a property of the specific construction of the TM. For example, we
can
> >have two TM's M,N that decide the same language but where M contains a
Halt
> >function and N doesn't (ie: M could use the halt function only on N
which
> >would always return true). Hence the property cannot be discerned from
the
> >language of the TM alone.
>
> I disagree based on what I consider "contain" to mean. If it means "there
> is a subset of states and transitions, such that halting is determined by
> entering a particular state", I'd have to say no.
> That is a property of
> the language, not the structure alone.
>
Let P = "contains a subset of states and transitions, such that ~the Halt
program's output~ is determined by entering a particular state".
(I've changed your quote to what I assume you meant, please correct me if
I'm wrong). Are you saying that you cannot have two TMs that recognize the
same language where one has property P and the other does not?
l8r, Mike N. Christoff
- Next message: Paul E. Black: "Re: Density of a random DAG ?"
- Previous message: Simon G Best: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- In reply to: Mitch Harris: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: Mitch Harris: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- Reply: Mitch Harris: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|