Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?
From: Kenneth Doyle (nobody_at_notmail.com)
Date: 08/05/04
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website"
- Previous message: rickthecockroach: "ssc. (was) Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 20:42:13 GMT
"Peter Olcott" <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
news:CwpQc.390740$Gx4.307021@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
>
> Then the program being analyzed does modify its behavior based
> on the returned value from WillHalt() as contrasted with not
> receiving a value.
But you're insisting that it's not the program being analysed that's
modified, but WillHalt itself. Go and read EXACTLY and PRECISELY what you
wrote.
-- CodeCutter - good, fast and cheap; pick two.
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: The proof that I was referring to is on the website"
- Previous message: rickthecockroach: "ssc. (was) Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: Foundation for a Formal Refutation of the Original Halting Problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|