Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?
From: >parr\(*> (gniKyruaL_at_tenretnitb.moc)
Date: 08/09/04
- Next message: >parr\(*>: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Previous message: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "re: Rado's Sigma and the Halting Problem for Programs"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:27:00 +0000 (UTC)
"Peter Olcott" <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:tJBRc.188786$OB3.16209@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
|
| "Marc Goodman" <marc.goodman@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KuuRc.229204$IQ4.196400@attbi_s02...
| >
| > Congratulations, you have successfully refuted NIST's informal
| > definition of the Halting Problem. Now you can move on to
| > Turing's proof, which somewhat related.
| >
|
| Here's three more that I have also refuted, that's four now.
| They all use a definition equivalent to the NIST definition.
| http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?HaltingProblem
| http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Halting_problem
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem
All of which are irrelevant.
You are still off topic.
You still haven't addressed Turing's proof.
-- )>==ss$$%PARR(º> Parr
- Next message: >parr\(*>: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Previous message: Arthur J. O'Dwyer: "re: Rado's Sigma and the Halting Problem for Programs"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
