Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?
From: Will Twentyman (wtwentyman_at_read.my.sig)
Date: 08/13/04
- Next message: Paul E. Black: "Re: Efficient Way to Eliminate Supersets?"
- Previous message: Will Twentyman: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Next in thread: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Reply: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:06:26 -0400
Kenneth Doyle wrote:
> Marc Goodman <marc.goodman@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:tzVSc.296564$XM6.75152@attbi_s53:
>>4). [George Hammond] does this whole weird science thing
>>much better anyway.
>>
>>YMMV...
>
>
> Yep, I would have nominated James Harris.
>
>
I'll second that nomination. James studies his subject to improve his
ability to sound like he understands what he's talking about.
-- Will Twentyman email: wtwentyman at copper dot net
- Next message: Paul E. Black: "Re: Efficient Way to Eliminate Supersets?"
- Previous message: Will Twentyman: "Re: Yet another Attempt at Disproving the Halting Problem"
- In reply to: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Next in thread: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Reply: Kenneth Doyle: "Re: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
