Re: Troll-debility sets in [was: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?]
From: Martin Shobe (mshobe_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 08/22/04
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Re: Proving a negative is hard"
- Previous message: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: Troll serial-killer claims 32nd victim [was: Attempt to Refute the Halting Problem's Refutation]"
- In reply to: Owen Jacobson: "Re: Troll-debility sets in [was: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?]"
- Next in thread: Simon G Best: "Re: Troll-debility sets in [was: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:53:39 GMT
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 07:22:49 GMT, Owen Jacobson
<angstrom@lionsanctuary.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:55:00 +0000, Simon G Best wrote:
>
>> >parr(*> wrote:
>>
>>> It could be that since Turing, work has been done to define a
>>> Turing-like Machine which handles asynchronous inputs, and can therefore
>>> be analysed mathematically. If there is, I'm sure someone will let me
>>> know and I can eat humble pie.
>>
>> What, exactly, do you mean by "asynchronous inputs"? Do you just mean
>> things like 'interactive' inputs? Or do you mean something which a
>> clocked state-machine would not be able to "handle"?
>
>Consider an asychronous keyboard handler triggered by a hardware
>interrupt that adds one to a value each time a keystroke is recieved. A
>program that simply reads this value over and over and never writes to it
>will nonetheless see this value climb unpredictably over time. This
>behaviour, a stored symbol changing without ever being written, is outside
>the definition of a Turing machine.
There are a number of things that can be done with computers that
can't be done with Turing machines. Interactive input, displaying
information on a screen, examining your own code, multithreading, etc.
However, any *computation* done by a computer can be done by a Turing
machine. In this case, you have to give results of each read of the
counter as input to TM.
Martin
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Re: Proving a negative is hard"
- Previous message: Acme Diagnostics: "Re: Troll serial-killer claims 32nd victim [was: Attempt to Refute the Halting Problem's Refutation]"
- In reply to: Owen Jacobson: "Re: Troll-debility sets in [was: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?]"
- Next in thread: Simon G Best: "Re: Troll-debility sets in [was: What is the Result from Invoking this Halt Function?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|