Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)
From: >parr\(*> (lauryking_at_N0SPAMbtinternet.moc)
Date: 08/25/04
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Previous message: George Greene: "Re: Can returning a value change the value itself (in the Halting Problem)"
- Maybe in reply to: Peter Olcott: "Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Next in thread: Scott Dorsey: "Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Reply: Scott Dorsey: "Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Reply: Evil Horseman: "Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:59:59 +0000 (UTC)
"Peter Olcott" <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:LT_Wc.245574$OB3.60982@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
| www.halting-proiblem.com
| I want to make what I am saying as clear as possible. If anyone
| has any points that are still not clear, this is the thread to ask for
| clarifications.
|
| Also I would like to work towards a consensus of the best way
| to present the ideas that are mentioned on my website,
| [...]
Some while back, I ran a semantic/syntactic clean-up program on your page, see end
of this post. I'm sure everyone will agree that the sense has been improved
dramatically.
One thing still missing is the inclusion of the Quantum logic process.
-- <º)&&PARR##sss==<( Parr -- ============= start revised text ================ Confutazione of the d'arresto problem. De Synopse Cracks: Alan Turing d'une, that one is the proven direction to obstruct qu'il, is impossible, to settle down a dell'arresto analyzer that a correct result always still gives the shutdowns the other way around to machine of Turing, that is analyzed. Since then that to the machine of Turing still gives to shutdowns the other way around or the resulting one, direction analyzed only of n'est of stabilization dell'analizzatore, test relative n'a of dell'arresto that it indicated that she is not that one, that the constructions an analyzer of the work of the apprehension in that one he correctly stop each universal element of l'ensemble of the white spots /negras something of Turing, is impossible. Definition of the d'arresto problem. Here n exist not a machine of Turing, that one that can determine correctly, if each universal element in l'ensemble of the white spots /negras something of the finished will s'exécutera Turing in certain number of d'étapes for specific of the data he of d'entrée. It types this test without ceremony. L'intradosso for this test without ceremony in the middle must in agreement with use the differences the first and point of the fast Synopse. Much which we must give to form the end to decide the end to eliminate the historical prohibition, nell'ordine that the problem of d'arresto of s'abstenir must emit shutdowns the other way around, the extreme result l'analyse l'étude. L'one-way, to this s'abstenir that it happens, to that it gives return to him for him are stopped simply of dell'arresto l analysor of the return for n'importe, machine of l'altra of Turing. Since then that l analysor of the box he to s'appeler of an apprehension of two diverse contexts. (1) like the part of the execution of d'une un'altra of Turing Machine's. (2) independently certain a other execution of Turing Machine's. These ways they slight them they returned them for are dell'arresto you l'analyse for each universal element of l'ensemble of the white spots /negras something of Turing to obtain always later. If l analysor dell'arresto that is to say, indicated like the part of the execution of d'une un'altra of Turing Machine's, he if to arrest it is simply determined. If l analysor dell'arresto qu'il n'a that does not determine indicated like the part of the execution of d'une un'altra of Turing Machine's, to follow analyzes the thematic description of the machine of Turing and writes THAT to a specific place of the volume of s'il it is arrested, if the ZERO to this are not written exactly places. The phase of L'ultima is the method, of that dell'arresto l analysor that can determine the relative context d invocation. That one can be a device the very simple ones, that one that is used in the machine for all the applications of Turing. Dell'arresto L analysor would request l'UTM simply, if the relative to that he obstructs specifically indicated that the circumstance has n'importe, of that d'état defined transistion. It is the very simple ones for l'UTM, this one the information, to make him the attempts simply available l'action, that l'état he is this in the relative table of the table of transistion d'état. S'il n'y does not have each transistion possible d'état, that one that is defined of the dell'arresto states that obstruct analyzer's, then l analysor of the apprehension of latta one is broken external with the emergency n'a of qu'il knows indicated like the part of the execution of d'une un'altra of Turing Machine's. Of s'il without the return of the danger the information can use this, to the box the end to determine a result around, or this qu'il must give the shutdowns the other way around to s'abstenir, a result. If this mass is made examinación, then the machine of Turing of the Gegenbeispiels, that had been used here, lower surfaces for the Contructing the test of d'arresto of the marks of the problem plus the end to have affinchè n'importe, the effect of l analysor dell'arresto or the relative capacity provides returns she corrects for each universal element of l'ensemble of the white spots /negras something of Turing. ============= end revised text ================
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Previous message: George Greene: "Re: Can returning a value change the value itself (in the Halting Problem)"
- Maybe in reply to: Peter Olcott: "Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Next in thread: Scott Dorsey: "Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Reply: Scott Dorsey: "Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Reply: Evil Horseman: "Re: Refutation of the Halting Problem's Proof (Clarifications Wanted)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|