Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?

From: Robert Low (mtx014_at_linux.services.coventry.ac.uk)
Date: 08/28/04

  • Next message: Will Twentyman: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?" 
    Date: 28 Aug 2004 13:03:22 GMT

    David C. Ullrich <ullrich@math.okstate.edu> wrote:
    >(Robert Low) wrote:
    >>and writing 'a forteriori' for a long time, too.
    >>Must have somehow polluted it with 'a posteriori'.
    >ah. seems to be a common misspelling, based on the
    >number of hits in a google search. i couldn't figure
    >out where people got it from - 'a posteriori' must
    >be the reason.

    Startlingly common, if anything: and used by too many
    people who ought to know better (amongst whom I include
    myself). 

    -- 
Rob.  http://www.mis.coventry.ac.uk/~mtx014/
  • Next message: Will Twentyman: "Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"