Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension
From: Simon G Best (s.g.best_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: Simon G Best: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- In reply to: Mitch Harris: "Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:52:24 +0000 (UTC)
Mitch Harris wrote:
> Simon G Best <s.g.best@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>
>>Oh, come on, Peter! If you actually bothered to properly read the many,
>>many, many replies you've had to your posts, you'd already know and
>>understand that it's /not/ that we don't 'get it', it's that we can see
>>that you're /ignoring/ the corrections that have so often been posted to
>>your 'misunderstandings'.
>
> But what if we're wrong?
What, about the Halting Problem? Or about Olcott being willfully ignorant?
Simon
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: Simon G Best: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- In reply to: Mitch Harris: "Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension"
- Next in thread: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension"
- Reply: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] halting problem reading comprehension"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|