Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?
From: Peter Olcott (olcott_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] halting problem: existence proofs"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- In reply to: David C. Ullrich: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Jym: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:15:40 GMT
"David C. Ullrich" <ullrich@math.okstate.edu> wrote in message news:1926j05c33gk149fp7nc3cbok7giuc8ck6@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:11:04 GMT, "Peter Olcott"
> <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >"Robert Low" <mtx014@linux.services.coventry.ac.uk> wrote in message news:cgsvv8$35r$2@sunbeam.coventry.ac.uk...
> >>
> >> Mitch Harris <harrisq@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> >> >TMs that have only write-only-memory are pretty boring. Why would you
> >> >limit yourself to such TMs?
> >>
> >> Who cares? If something can't be done by any Turing machine at
> >> all, it certainly can't be done by one which satisfies
> >> some additional constraint.
> >
> >Yet the possibility exists that the conclusion that it can't
> >be done by any Turing Machine at all is incorrect.
>
> no, there is no such possibility. the fact that you're either
> to stupid or too obstinate to follow a simple proof doesn't
> change that.
>
> >That
> >is my whole point. So far in about two months no one
> >has fully (and correctly) refuted this position.
>
> just as the fact that you keep saying this doesn't make
> it so.
Likewise with what you are saying. Why don't you join in
the refutation developed by newstome@comcast.net?
You only have to derive an example of data that one
model of my methods can not possibly process. Read
the prior postings between him and me for the details.
- Next message: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] halting problem: existence proofs"
- Previous message: Peter Olcott: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- In reply to: David C. Ullrich: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Reply: Jym: "Re: [PO] Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|