Re: [PO] halting problem: existence proofs

From: Mitch Harris (harrisq_at_tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de)
Date: 08/30/04


Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:00:05 +0200

Peter Olcott wrote:
>
> I am limiting this to every existing proof...

That is a pretty bold statement you've been making. Who
knows what other kinds of proofs there are?

Maybe you mean every proof that uses diagonalization?

-- 
Mitch Harris
(remove q to reply)


Relevant Pages

  • Re: [PO] halting problem: existence proofs
    ... Peter Olcott wrote: ... > I am limiting this to every existing proof... ... That is a pretty bold statement you've been making. ... Mitch Harris ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: [PO] halting problem: existence proofs
    ... > Peter Olcott wrote: ... > That is a pretty bold statement you've been making. ... > Maybe you mean every proof that uses diagonalization? ... > Mitch Harris ...
    (comp.theory)
  • Re: [PO] halting problem: existence proofs
    ... > Peter Olcott wrote: ... > That is a pretty bold statement you've been making. ... > Maybe you mean every proof that uses diagonalization? ... > Mitch Harris ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: [PO] halting problem: existence proofs
    ... Peter Olcott wrote: ... >>That is a pretty bold statement you've been making. ... >>Maybe you mean every proof that uses diagonalization? ... >>Mitch Harris ...
    (comp.theory)