Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?
From: >parr\(*> (lauryking_at_N0-SPAMbtinternet.moc)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: >parr\(*>: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: Robert Low: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- In reply to: Jym: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: Jym: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:02:04 +0000 (UTC)
"Jym" <moyen@loria.fr> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.51.0408301950490.28737@repaix.loria.fr...
| On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Peter Olcott wrote:
| <...>
| Once you've given up Turing, do you intend to attack Gödel ?
| <...>
He's already tried that and accepted he's wrong; see his interminable
posts on comp.sys.apple2 in 2001 such as:
http://tinyurl.com/3vzsk
=
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&threadm=3A883A
5C.15DC22C0%40qwest.net&rnum=25&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dolcott%2Bgodel%26num%
3D100%26hl%3Den%26lr%3Dlang_en%26ie%3DUTF-8%26scoring%3Dd
-- )>==ss$$%PARR(º> Parr
- Next message: >parr\(*>: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Previous message: Robert Low: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- In reply to: Jym: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Next in thread: Jym: "Re: [PO] Re: Can a regular Turing Machine provide Protected Memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|