Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)
From: Leonard Blackburn (blackbur_at_math.umn.edu)
Date: 09/17/04
- Next message: Jym: "Re: A way for P!=NP"
- Previous message: Daniel A. Jimenez: "Re: A way for P!=NP"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 17 Sep 2004 09:06:58 -0700
"Peter Olcott" <olcott@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<F7o_c.306805$OB3.221936@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
> In retrospect it was apparently me that was wrong all along.
> Alan Turing was right, and from this I will venture to make
> an educated guess that Kurt Gödel was also right.
>
> I doubt if I will ever venture to these two places again, but,
> if I do it will be with much greater humility.
Impossible! I stopped reading Peter Olcott's nonsense a couple of
weeks ago. I don't come back to sci.logic until now, and here's a
post that PO has been cured of CrackPottery! I don't believe it. My
guess is that you have been lying all along (or that you are not
currently you). I may be wrong.
-L.B.
- Next message: Jym: "Re: A way for P!=NP"
- Previous message: Daniel A. Jimenez: "Re: A way for P!=NP"
- In reply to: Peter Olcott: "Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
