Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|

From: Abraham Buckingham (twizlewink_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/23/04

  • Next message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
    Date: 23 Sep 2004 06:00:06 -0700
    
    

    erayo@bilkent.edu.tr (Eray Ozkural exa) wrote in message news:<fa69ae35.0409221823.682ae186@posting.google.com>...
    > Let's have an algorithm that starts with
    > 0.1 in binary, and constructs a tree in breadth-first fashion
    >
    > 0.1
    > 0.01 0.11
    > 0.001 0.011....
    >
    > You get the idea... It's obvious that this tree has the same
    > cardinality as Z, since this is a nonhalting algorithm (or since I can
    > give an integer to every node, etc.) Now, I want to prove that such a
    > subdivision procedure cannot generate all x in (0,1) in an intuitive
    > way. Is the easiest method proof by contradiction?
    >
    > Regards,

    All of the numbers you have generated are of finite length, can you
    find some numbers who's binary representations never terminate?
    Finding counter-examples seems to me to be a form of proof by
    contradiction although I find it convienent to distinquish between the
    two since counter-examples are sometimes easier to find then a deduced
    logical flaw, although essentially I think that's what you're doing.

    If you're looking for a mapping from your set to the subset of
    naturals you could try taking the set of primes and mapping them like
    so, 0.1 = 2^1, 0.01 = 3^1, 0.11 = 2^1 * 3^1 and so on, giving a unique
    prime to each binary place and making each of the numbers your
    algorithm generates match up with a unique number. of the form p_1^{0
    or 1} * p_2^{0 or 1} * ... * p_n^{0 or 1} where p_k is the k-th prime
    number and n is the breadth of the number and you select 0 or 1 based
    on which binary digit is in the k-th place of the number. You could
    then refer to Cantor's proof of the uncountability of the interval
    (0,1). Mapping in a similar fashion to powers of primes is an easy way
    to show that the cartisan product of two countable sets is also
    countable, by mapping it to a subset of N and extends easily to the
    case of n cartisean products. Hope this helps. :)


  • Next message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|
      ... and constructs a tree in breadth-first fashion ... It's obvious that this tree has the same ... since this is a nonhalting algorithm (or since I can ... naturals you could try taking the set of primes and mapping them like ...
      (sci.math)
    • Another set with cardinality |Z|
      ... and constructs a tree in breadth-first fashion ... It's obvious that this tree has the same ... since this is a nonhalting algorithm (or since I can ... Regards, ...
      (comp.theory)
    • Another set with cardinality |Z|
      ... and constructs a tree in breadth-first fashion ... It's obvious that this tree has the same ... since this is a nonhalting algorithm (or since I can ... Regards, ...
      (sci.math)
    • Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|
      ... Eray Ozkural exa wrote: ... and constructs a tree in breadth-first fashion ... It's obvious that this tree has the same ... since this is a nonhalting algorithm (or since I can ...
      (comp.theory)
    • Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|
      ... and constructs a tree in breadth-first fashion ... >cardinality as Z, since this is a nonhalting algorithm (or since I can ...
      (sci.math)