Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)
From: Robert Low (mtx014_at_linux.services.coventry.ac.uk)
Date: 09/23/04
- Next message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: A way for P!=NP"
- Previous message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- In reply to: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Next in thread: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Reply: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Reply: Mike Oliver: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 23 Sep 2004 13:28:46 GMT
Charlie-Boo <chvol@aol.com> wrote:
>3. Incomplete or inconsistent specs.
>Come to think of it, the halting problem (and Godel's Incompleteness
>Theorem et. al.) is just a case of # 3. Ho hum.
Except, of course, that it isn't. The specification "f is a
function which takes a TM description and an input tape, and
returns 1 if the TM halts on the input and 0 if it does
not" is neither incomplete nor inconsistent. It just happens
to be a function that cannot be computed by a TM. Proving
that is not so "ho hum" (though it's easy once you know the
answer, of course).
-- Rob. http://www.mis.coventry.ac.uk/~mtx014/
- Next message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: A way for P!=NP"
- Previous message: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- In reply to: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Next in thread: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Reply: Charlie-Boo: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Reply: Mike Oliver: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading