Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|
From: Kristian Lahdensuo (kristian.lahdensuo_at_suomi24.fi)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: Barb Knox: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Previous message: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- In reply to: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Next in thread: wehrmacht: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Reply: wehrmacht: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 05:10:51 +0300
ou live near there, near the
"Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> kirjoitti viestissä
news:309487969562efcc83456d46bafabcfc.48257@mygate.mailgate.org...
> "Eray Ozkural exa" <erayo@bilkent.edu.tr> wrote:
>
> [Yes, I know I'm in his killfile, it's lots of fun
> to prove him an idiot where everyone but him can
> see, sort of an "Emperor's new clothes" situation.]
>
> > But well, the depth of the entire tree
>
> Well, no, you're making the *exact* *same* *mistake*
> _*again*_.
>
> Did you miss all the helpful postings attempting to
> warn you of your error? <snicker>
>
> What is "the entire tree"? It is the "entire tree
> _now_", where "now" is explicitly _after_ the last
> step.
>
> What is the problem about specifying things "after
> the last step" of a process with a (here countably)
> infinite number of steps, as items on which to base
> your understanding of reality?
>
> Oh, yes. There _IS NO_ "last step". So your "the
> entire tree" is what? It is a _meaningless noise_,
> quite probably a "snap", a "crackle", or a "pop"
> from the box from whose back side you cut out your
> computer science PhD's diploma.
>
> Basing your understanding of computer theory on
> meaningless noises is A (Very) Bad Idea.
>
> Too bad you don't check the "ether" for useful
> information, you'd waste much less time making an
> laughingstock of yourself in fora where your
> background knowledge is (vastly) insufficient to
> be a contributor.
>
> That's a little finding I just might have mentioned
> in the past about you. It is nice of you, after all
> the denials you gave then, to be so industriously
> proving me correct now, and doing it entirely
> oblivious to the results.
>
> xanthian, cruel to the bone, and then some.
>
>
> --
> Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Next message: Barb Knox: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Previous message: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- In reply to: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Next in thread: wehrmacht: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Reply: wehrmacht: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|