Zenkin's paper on Cantor
From: Eray Ozkural exa (erayo_at_bilkent.edu.tr)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: Robert Low: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Previous message: G. Frege: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Next in thread: Robert Low: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Robert Low: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Ryan Reich: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Tim Peters: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Craig Feinstein: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 26 Sep 2004 07:53:26 -0700
Here is a much more refined attack on Cantor's proof than what has
lately occured in some threads that I have avoided:
http://www.com2com.ru/alexzen/papers/Cantor/Fatal_Mistake_of_Cantor.html
Does Alexander Zenkin have a good point?
Regards,
-- Eray
- Next message: Robert Low: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Previous message: G. Frege: "Re: Olcott is cured of CrackPottery! (Halting Problem)"
- Next in thread: Robert Low: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Robert Low: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Ryan Reich: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Tim Peters: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Craig Feinstein: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]