Re: Another claim for P=NP
From: Alex Hunsley (lard_at_tardis.ed.ac.molar.uk)
Date: 10/20/04
- Previous message: smangano_at_ureach.com: "Re: Proof that this assertion about heaps is true"
- Next in thread: Robert Low: "Re: Another claim for P=NP"
- Reply: Robert Low: "Re: Another claim for P=NP"
- Reply: John P. Green: "Re: Another claim for P=NP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:28:08 +0100
Eray Ozkural exa wrote:
> I'm not sympathetic for claims that P=NP, but here is another one by
> Bringsjord and Taylor that a friend referred me to.
>
> http://kryten.mm.rpi.edu/scb.pnp.solved14.pdf
".... like what we provide."
Ugh. What a *lovely* turn of phrase.
- Previous message: smangano_at_ureach.com: "Re: Proof that this assertion about heaps is true"
- Next in thread: Robert Low: "Re: Another claim for P=NP"
- Reply: Robert Low: "Re: Another claim for P=NP"
- Reply: John P. Green: "Re: Another claim for P=NP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|