[OT]: Another claim for P=NP

From: Kent Paul Dolan (xanthian_at_well.com)
Date: 10/25/04

  • Next message: Jean-S?bastien Bolduc: "Re: Semantics of LTS" 
    Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:01:08 +0000 (UTC)

    "Eray Ozkural exa" <erayo@bilkent.edu.tr> wrote:

    > I'm not sympathetic for claims that P=NP, but here
    > is another one by Bringsjord and Taylor that a
    > friend referred me to.

    > http://kryten.mm.rpi.edu/scb.pnp.solved14.pdf

    While it has become blazingly obvious that you set
    no value on your reputation, your ongoing trolling
    of comp.theory is shameful and contemptable.

    Several hundred valueless articles in response to
    your efforts have recently cluttered this newsgroup,
    deliberately and maliciously prolonged by you long
    past the point where your questions had been
    answered and your viewpoint refuted, detracting
    seriously from the newsgroup's usefulness.

    Try finding some productive use for your time,
    instead.

    xanthian. 

    -- 
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
  • Next message: Jean-S?bastien Bolduc: "Re: Semantics of LTS"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Another claim for P=NP
      ... Eray Ozkural exa wrote: ... > Bringsjord and Taylor that a friend referred me to. ... What a *lovely* turn of phrase. ...
      (comp.theory)
    • Another claim for P=NP
      ... Bringsjord and Taylor that a friend referred me to. ... soapfilm arguments, but well, maybe it's been discussed elsewhere. ... Regards, ...
      (comp.theory)