Largest provable BB(N)?
From: Russell Wallace (wallacethinmintr_at_eircom.net)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Robert Low: "Re: Largest provable BB(N)?"
- Previous message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: P vs NP craziness"
- Next in thread: Robert Low: "Re: Largest provable BB(N)?"
- Reply: Robert Low: "Re: Largest provable BB(N)?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:17:51 GMT
Hi all,
Does anyone know whether there's a reasonable guess as to the largest
value for which the value of the busy-beaver function BB(N) is
provable?
Specifically: This would require a proof of non-halting for all the
N-state Turing machines that don't halt; so presumably there's an N
such that there's an N+1-state Turing machine whose non-halting cannot
be proven.
And by "provable" I mean within the scope of known mathematics... is
Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory the most powerful axiomatic system we
have? Is there any prospect that something more powerful might be
discovered in the future?
I imagine the actual value of N isn't known, but has anyone made an
informed guess as to whether it might be 10, 20, 50 or so?
Thanks,
-- "Always look on the bright side of life." To reply by email, remove the small snack from address.
- Next message: Robert Low: "Re: Largest provable BB(N)?"
- Previous message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: P vs NP craziness"
- Next in thread: Robert Low: "Re: Largest provable BB(N)?"
- Reply: Robert Low: "Re: Largest provable BB(N)?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]