Re: [OT]: Another claim for P=NP

From: Eray Ozkural exa (examachine_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/09/04

  • Next message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: P vs NP craziness & Diaby was already refuted... in 1988" 
    Date: 9 Nov 2004 12:07:41 -0800

    In which Mr. Dolan once again demonstrates his lack of basic English
    comprehension skills.

    When I say I'm not sympathetic for these claims, I mean, politely,
    that I don't believe that any of these amazingly silly papers could be
    correct. But sometimes these funny papers are written in such a
    language that people who are not familiar with the subject (say an
    electrical engineer like my friend who sent me the link to it) are
    convinced by these claims simply because it looks long and complicated
    enough, and written by somebody at a prestigious institute like RPI.

    What I mean is let's face it, it doesn't matter where this crap gets
    written, who writes it, or who reads it. It's crap.

    Maybe Mr. Dolan will understand straightforward language like this.
    (And perhaps the hallucinating researcher who wrote this article will
    take it offline and apologize to everybody for wasting their time)

    "Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote in message news:<e66d75999d804ac52fed1cdde8b7dbd4.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>...
    > "Eray Ozkural exa" <erayo@bilkent.edu.tr> wrote:
    >
    > > I'm not sympathetic for claims that P=NP, but here
    > > is another one by Bringsjord and Taylor that a
    > > friend referred me to.
    >
    > > http://kryten.mm.rpi.edu/scb.pnp.solved14.pdf
    >
    > While it has become blazingly obvious that you set
    > no value on your reputation, your ongoing trolling
    > of comp.theory is shameful and contemptable.
    >
    > Several hundred valueless articles in response to
    > your efforts have recently cluttered this newsgroup,
    > deliberately and maliciously prolonged by you long
    > past the point where your questions had been
    > answered and your viewpoint refuted, detracting
    > seriously from the newsgroup's usefulness.
    >
    > Try finding some productive use for your time,
    > instead.
    >
    > xanthian.

  • Next message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: P vs NP craziness & Diaby was already refuted... in 1988"

    Relevant Pages