Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 11/15/04
- Next message: Mirko Knoll: "Re: Push relabel modification to show used paths (maxflow problem)"
- Previous message: Paul E. Black: "Re: Data structure for finding min of set intersection"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:25:25 -0500
In <320e992a.0411140136.75b1a6fe@posting.google.com>, on 11/14/2004
at 01:36 AM, examachine@gmail.com (Eray Ozkural exa) said:
>If you understand the terms, it can be mathematics.
The inability to formulate a definition usually indicates that you
don't understand the terms. Definitions in Mathematics are omitted
only when they are commonly agreed upon, and even then it is customary
to set forth the nomenclature used to avoid ambiguity. Using a
nonstandard term without a definition is a sign of sloppy thinking and
is a red flag.
>While the truth of Cantor's theorem follows from ZFC in a finite
>number of steps (this is easily seen!), I must admit that I cannot
>readily observe how Cantor's diagonal *proof* terminates in a finite
>number of steps.
A proof is not an automaton. A proof is not an algorithm. A proof is a
series of applications of rules of inference. It doesn't start and
stop, it just is. Every step lies there for your examination.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Mirko Knoll: "Re: Push relabel modification to show used paths (maxflow problem)"
- Previous message: Paul E. Black: "Re: Data structure for finding min of set intersection"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|