Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)
From: David Longley (David_at_longley.demon.co.uk)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: Josh Purinton: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Previous message: Heiner Marxen: "Re: Data structure for finding min of set intersection"
- In reply to: JPL Verhey: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Reply: JPL Verhey: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:20:04 +0000
In article <419c4735$0$44080$5fc3050@dreader2.news.tiscali.nl>, JPL
Verhey <matterDELminds@hotmail.com> writes
>
>"David Longley" <David@longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:ogGFp6BAYAnBFwB6@longley.demon.co.uk...
>> In article <320e992a.0411171745.ba123df@posting.google.com>, Eray
>> Ozkural exa <examachine@gmail.com> writes
>>>"Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> wrote in message
>>>news:<a8d13dcbdca7ae739b921bb2ba3db48e.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>...
>>>> "Eray Ozkural exa" <examachine@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> You are certainly an embarrassment to your
>>>> university's degree program....
>>>
>>>With these kinds of remarks, you only underwrite your mental illness.
>>>
>>>You have understood absolutely nothing from my posts, and this is not
>>>surprising. But *you* are an amazing specimen.
>>>
>>>Your attitude became apparent when you failed to understand the real
>>>content of the extremely simple k-means problem. Your goal is not to
>>>understand. Your goal is to abuse people. AFAICT, you are merely a
>>>simpleton who knows how to google. There are so many like you, Mr.
>>>Dolan, and most of them grow out of that behavior when they finish
>>>high school.
>>>
>>>Disgusted,
>>>
>>>--
>>>Eray
>>
>> This is false.
>
>Haha..
>Well DL, there is no one understanding you better than Dolan.
>
>> --
>> David Longley
>
>
And there's an illustrative example of why it's false. Most people, at
any age, don't take criticism well (if at all), and very very few
actively seek it out even when it's in their own best interests to do
so. It's an essential skill of the professional to court criticism. It's
the sine qua non for learning.
Your grasp of the affective disorders and behaviour is as flawed as
Ozkurals'.
-- David Longley
- Next message: Josh Purinton: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Previous message: Heiner Marxen: "Re: Data structure for finding min of set intersection"
- In reply to: JPL Verhey: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Reply: JPL Verhey: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|