Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation

From: JXStern (JXSternChangeX2R_at_gte.net)
Date: 11/21/04


Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:03:53 GMT

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:41:25 +0000 (UTC), "Kent Paul Dolan"
<xanthian@well.com> wrote:

>Turing Machines are under precisely _no_ obligation
>to be physically realizable. They teach this point
>in school, Eray, where were you at the time?

I don't know where Eray was, but from the moment I first heard this
sort of stuff, I wondered about it. Many false "fact" are taught in
school, though their falsity may not be overturned until years or
centuries later. Don't just appeal to authority here. Technically,
sure, one can study Turing Machine functions that cannot be physically
realized. But that does not make Turing Machine theory inapplicable
to machines that can be realized.

>I'm pretty sure at this point you have stepped well
>past the bounds of sane thinking. You are trying to
>limit "science" to "physical science", and that
>limitation only exists in your own mind.

Would you like to give an example of non-physical science?

J.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation
    ... >in school, Eray, where were you at the time? ... I don't know where Eray was, but from the moment I first heard this ... one can study Turing Machine functions that cannot be physically ... But that does not make Turing Machine theory inapplicable ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation
    ... > I don't know where Eray was, but from the moment I first heard this ... But that does not make Turing Machine theory inapplicable ... Science is first and foremost the science of complex physical events. ... there is no need to talk about actually infinite fractal objects. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation
    ... > I don't know where Eray was, but from the moment I first heard this ... But that does not make Turing Machine theory inapplicable ... Science is first and foremost the science of complex physical events. ... there is no need to talk about actually infinite fractal objects. ...
    (comp.theory)