Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals
From: Chakravarthi (pschax_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/26/04
- Next message: Poker Joker: "Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Next in thread: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals"
- Maybe reply: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals"
- Maybe reply: Stephen Harris: "Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 25 Nov 2004 19:44:20 -0800
> Therefore no unique finite sequence of digits is made, although the
> construction is logically valid it does not generate a new sequence of
> digits. The implication that a new sequence is made is contradicted.
> Herc
Cantor's argument was just that ...
If u r clever to say that the diagnol sequence already exists
down the line... by the initial assumption (to the contrary)
that the list is deumerable.. this sequence exists with a number
tag to it..say 'n'.
Now the 'n'th bit or digit of this sequence (according to our construction)
is diiferent from the diagnol sequence which is a contradiction.
So the set of all the possible sequences is not denumerable.
chax.
- Next message: Poker Joker: "Re: Infinite number of people toss a coin infinite times"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor (reply of Dr. Zenkin)"
- Next in thread: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals"
- Maybe reply: Victor Eijkhout: "Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals"
- Maybe reply: Stephen Harris: "Re: DISPROOF of the uncountability of reals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|