mathematics
From: patty (pattyNO_at_SPAMicyberspace.net)
Date: 11/29/04
- Next message: David Longley: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: Acid Pooh: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Platonism"
- Next in thread: Jon Haugsand: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: Jon Haugsand: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: Neil W Rickert: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: JXStern: "Re: mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:24:35 GMT
Eray Ozkural exa wrote:
>
> What is this mysterious objectivity in a way that ordinary things
> could not be?
Because when people and\or computers correctly follow procedures using
the signs of these things they always come up with exactly the same
results. Try to do that with your cars, and tables, and other cudiments.
patty
- Next message: David Longley: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: Acid Pooh: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Platonism"
- Next in thread: Jon Haugsand: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: Jon Haugsand: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: Neil W Rickert: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: JXStern: "Re: mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
