Re: Platonism
From: JXStern (JXSternChangeX2R_at_gte.net)
Date: 11/30/04
- Next message: JXStern: "Re: mathematics"
- Previous message: Stephen Harris: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Platonism"
- Next in thread: patty: "Re: Platonism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:40:46 GMT
On 28 Nov 2004 16:39:19 -0800, examachine@gmail.com (Eray Ozkural
exa) wrote:
>Yes, but in the end what matters is whether what you wanted to refer
>to by "dragons" exists at all. Or you are both talking nonsense
>(lying, deluded, etc.).
Perhaps we were discussing Tolkien's Lord of the Rings.
>Doesn't it bother you when somebody talks about the devil?
Depends what they say.
But whether it bothers me or not, isn't really the deciding factor, is
it?
>> 42.
>
>You mean logical positivism is as absurd as thinking 42 is the meaning
>of life?
I mean short and easy answers to complex questions might as well be
"42".
J.
- Next message: JXStern: "Re: mathematics"
- Previous message: Stephen Harris: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Platonism"
- Next in thread: patty: "Re: Platonism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading