Re: mathematics
From: patty (pattyNO_at_SPAMicyberspace.net)
Date: 11/30/04
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: Acid Pooh: "Re: mathematics"
- In reply to: JXStern: "Re: mathematics"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: Platonism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:36:28 GMT
JXStern wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:24:35 GMT, patty <pattyNO@SPAMicyberspace.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Because when people and\or computers correctly follow procedures using
>>the signs of these things they always come up with exactly the same
>>results. Try to do that with your cars, and tables, and other cudiments.
>
>
> Did someone cancel cause and effect? I didn't get the memo.
>
I was answering Eray's question "What is this mysterious objectivity in
a way that ordinary things could not be?". He was talking about
mathematical objects. I gave a criteria for defining the objectivity of
mathematical objects. The only cause-effect is the interpretive
behavior of humans *creating* ("causing") groupings of two's and three's
in the world of their interpretation. The noumenal world gets on quite
nicely without those groupings confusing it. They are mere beauty in
our eyes; yet unlike beauty, they are objective ... they do not vary
between person and person ... hence the the mystery.
So the memo was about cause and effect ... it just wasn't where you
expected it to be.
patty
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: Acid Pooh: "Re: mathematics"
- In reply to: JXStern: "Re: mathematics"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: Platonism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|