Re: mathematics
From: Eray Ozkural exa (examachine_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/30/04
- Next message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: patty: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Next in thread: Stephen Harris: "Re: mathematics"
- Maybe reply: Stephen Harris: "Re: mathematics"
- Maybe reply: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: mathematics"
- Maybe reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: mathematics"
- Maybe reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 Nov 2004 12:38:06 -0800
Neil W Rickert <rickert+nn@cs.niu.edu> wrote in message news:<cogl1b$qcu$3@usenet.cso.niu.edu>...
> examachine@gmail.com (Eray Ozkural exa) writes:
>
> >Nothing transcends the objectivity of physics.
>
> There were things believed true in physics, prior to Einstein's
> relativity, that are now considered false. Which had the
> transcendent objectivity? The "before" physics, or the "after"
> physics?
>
> We could come up with other examples before and after QM.
>
> ------
>
> Don't get me wrong. I am not criticizing physics here. But I think
> you need to be careful with terms such as "transcendent objectivity."
Hmm. I think there is no increase in objectivity.
Regards,
-- Eray Ozkural
- Next message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: patty: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Next in thread: Stephen Harris: "Re: mathematics"
- Maybe reply: Stephen Harris: "Re: mathematics"
- Maybe reply: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: mathematics"
- Maybe reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: mathematics"
- Maybe reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
