Re: mathematics
From: Kent Paul Dolan (xanthian_at_well.com)
Date: 12/03/04
- Previous message: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Example of a formulation in production scheduling"
- In reply to: David Bandel: "Re: mathematics"
- Next in thread: David Bandel: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: David Bandel: "Re: mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 04:14:14 +0000 (UTC)
"David Bandel" <SharpNova@gmail.com> wrote:
> and shut the hell up.
How sad for you that you are a nobody, and patty is
a respected community member, so your advice will be
considered by its source, and laughed out of town.
> ur an idiot.
On the behavioral test, that would be you.
This isn't a chat line, and "ur" is a word,
but not one you've used correctly.
> and cudiment isn't a word.
You opinion, as a nobody, with a worthless
reputation, is rejected, you need to supply
proof of your claim.
You intend to prove that claim then, exactly
how?
xanthian.
-- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
- Previous message: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Example of a formulation in production scheduling"
- In reply to: David Bandel: "Re: mathematics"
- Next in thread: David Bandel: "Re: mathematics"
- Reply: David Bandel: "Re: mathematics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|