Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion.
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 12/03/04
- Next message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: Stephen Harris: "Re: Poll: Are PCs Turing Machines?"
- Next in thread: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- Reply: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:12:10 -0800
HERC777 wrote:
>
> Infinite people each flip coins infinite times.
> Can you always find a different sequence of heads and tails?
Wait for the data to fuly accumulate, then look. Idiot. Given n
flips there will be 2^n states. That will nicely outrace any
approximation to infinity you attempt.
> sci.math and sci.logic went quiet on this question for about a week,
> then against all logic, probability theory, and common sense they all
> agreed YES. Believers of hyperinfinities have no shame!
Georg Cantor. As for you, FOAD.
[snip crap]
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: tchow_at_lsa.umich.edu: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: Stephen Harris: "Re: Poll: Are PCs Turing Machines?"
- Next in thread: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- Reply: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: No Unique Initial Segment And No Characteristic Expansion."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading