Re: Platonism
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 12/05/04
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: mathematics"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Platonism"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Platonism"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Platonism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 18:01:17 -0500
In <320e992a.0412011952.729543f4@posting.google.com>, on 12/01/2004
at 07:52 PM, examachine@gmail.com (Eray Ozkural exa) said:
>The effectiveness of mathematics in natural sciences is not
>unreasonable. I wonder who ever thought it was.
Those who understand it better than you, like Wigner.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: mathematics"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Platonism"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Platonism"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Platonism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|