Re: Platonism
stephen_at_nomail.com
Date: 12/06/04
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Robust Algorithms"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Platonism"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Platonism"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Platonism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 6 Dec 2004 16:17:18 GMT
In sci.math Lester Zick <lesterDELzick@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
: On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 03:03:48 +0000 (UTC), Dave Seaman
: <dseaman@no.such.host> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
:>On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 23:29:02 GMT, Lester Zick wrote:
:>> Yeah, I say specific sets so you reply non specific sets.
:>
:>Is P(N) a specific set? Can you give an example of a non-specific set?
: I can give examples of specific sets.
:>> I'm sure
:>> you'll be interested to learn the only sets where order is irrelevant
:>> are cardinal sets because differences between successive elements in
:>> the set are equal.
:>
:>Nonsense. Sets never have an order unless we specify one.
: And so far you are unwilling to discuss sets where we specify one, in
: other words, specific sets.
How does having order make a set specific? What do you even
mean by 'specific'? Consider the set of students taking a given
course in a given semester. There is a very specific set of students
taking the course I am teaching this semester. There are several
different ways that the set can be ordered and often there is no need
to consider any order when discussing the set. This
set definitely has a cardinality.
Stephen
- Next message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: Robust Algorithms"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Platonism"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Platonism"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Platonism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|