Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation
From: Albert van der Horst (albert_at_spenarnc.xs4all.nl)
Date: 12/06/04
- Next message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Platonism"
- Maybe in reply to: patty: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 06 Dec 2004 21:38:09 GMT
In article <cnvv6k$aak$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>, <stephen@nomail.com> wrote:
>In sci.math JXStern <JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net> wrote:
>: On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 05:50:40 GMT, "Stephen Harris"
>: <cyberguard1048-usenet@yahoo.com> wrote:
>:> Definition: Common term for "computer", usually when considered at
>:>the hardware level. The Turing Machine, an early example of this usage, was
>:>however neither hardware nor software, but only an idea.
>:>http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/machine
>
>: It was a gedankenexperiment, and eminently realizable in physical
>: form, purposely so, to answer Hilbert's #10.
>
>: Someone remind me, are there any TM results that depend on an infinite
>: tape for positive results?
>
>: J.
>
>Sure. Can the language a^n b^n for n>=0 be recognized by a Turing
>Machine, or recognized at all. If you only have a finite tape
>than there are members of this language you cannot recognize.
The wording is a bit metaphysical.
This problem is such that for each N there is an instance of
a language item wherefore a dedicated TM will need a tape
that is larger than N.
Actual infinity doesn't enter the picture.
That there are probably values of N this universe can't cope
with 1) (though we don't know enough of this universe to actually
pin down numbers) is irrelevant to the mathematical analysis.
I really can't see why Plato should rear his ugly head in
this context.
1) If and when some one ventures to make a physical model of
a Turing machine.
>
>Stephen
--
--
Albert van der Horst,Oranjestr 8,3511 RA UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS
One man-hour to invent,
One man-week to implement,
One lawyer-year to patent.
- Next message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Platonism"
- Previous message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Platonism"
- Maybe in reply to: patty: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Next in thread: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Reply: Kent Paul Dolan: "Re: Turing Machines and Physical Computation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|