Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms
From: David James Polewka (joseywales_at_outlaw.nospam)
Date: 12/14/04
- Previous message: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- In reply to: Jón Fairbairn: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Next in thread: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:19:29 GMT
Fairbairn" <jon.fairbairn@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>Ralph Hartley <hartley@aic.nrl.navy.mil> writes:
>
>> David James Polewka wrote:
>>
>> > That's right! The number of people who believe something
>> > has nothing to do with whether it is true or false! Never has,
>> > and never will!
>>
>> Many people disagree with that!
>
>Actually, there's an instance where it does: money. If
>enough people believe that the dollar is worth less, it's
>worth less. ;-)
Some people think it's ok to drink until you drop, and
damn the consequences. Some think there's no truth;
the truth is whatever you want it to be; everything is
partisan politics and spin. They are merely retarding
forces that We Shall Overcome!
=========================
"Endeavor to persevere"
=========================
- Previous message: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- In reply to: Jón Fairbairn: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Next in thread: David James Polewka: "Re: [OT] (was): Robust Algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|